 |
 |
|
No
one knows
|
The human capacity for self-deception, Chairman
Jimmy tells us, is limitless. Nowhere is that
more true than in the advertising business. In our arrogance,
we have convinced ourselves that we know what we are doing.
We present ourselves to clients as experts. We create processes,
analytical tools, grids and systems, all designed to move
the science of advertising forward. We pontificate
and posture, generating an endless parade of self-serving
books, articles and symposia, feeding the illusion that
there exists a rich body of advertising knowledge and insight.
One is left with the impression that, when an ad is created,
the discerning advertising professional will be able to
tell if it will be a good (whatever that is), successful
(whatever that is) ad, before it goes out into the world.
In the words of Gwen Dawkins, I disagree. Id
like to suggest that, to the extent that knowledge is predictive,
no one really knows much of anything about advertising.
We all look for, or pretend to have found, the Secret, the
magic formula or anti-formula. But the fact remains that,
for any given ad at any time, your guess is as good as mine
whether it will work or not. Whatever working
may mean. And your opinion is as good as mine as to whether
its a good or a bad ad. What
combination of fresh, original, meaningful, entertaining,
compelling, simple, single-minded, unexpected, successful,
blah blah blah attributes constitutes the magic ad formula?
What does each of us mean by each of those terms? And does
our point of view have anything in common with the clients,
much less the targets.
Sometimes hokey, patronizing, demeaning, moronic, unremarkable
and/or misleading ads seem to boost sales. Sometimes not.
The same holds true for outrageous, out-of-the-box, breakthrough,
cutting edge (stop me before I cliche again) advertising.
Even if an ad doesnt boost sales, it may enhance and
reinforce the Brand. I guess. It may lubricate the ongoing
dialogue between consumer and advertiser. Or so Ive
been told. How do you measure degree of lubrication? Conversely,
the moronic ad may do damage to, and ultimately erode the
Brand, leading to sagging sales. Unless the sagging sales
are due to a flawed media plan. Or some other variable or
set of variables in the marketing mix.
No matter how you define a successful ad, there is simply
no way to know ahead of time whether a particular ad will
be successful. Because the multiple landscapes of our culture,
advertising, and every individuals brain, each overlaid
upon another, are constantly moving and shifitng at different
rates and in different directions. Morphing, if you will.
Advertisings task becomes to hit several simultaneously
moving targets at the same time, armed with gummie arrows.
And despite what the research guys tell you, theres
also no way to know exactly which people, and how many of
them, actually process any particular ad. By process
I dont mean are exposed to or even see
an ad. I mean become engaged by and react to the ad. Nor
do we have any way of telling just what it is about an ad
that gets processed, or exactly what role, if any, the ad
plays in the purchase decision. I love Nike advertising,
but dont care for the shoes. I live for M&Ms,
but wince at the advertising. My consuming behavior is unique
to me -- constantly shifting, adapting, changing in a thousand
undetectable ways. Multiply that by everybody.
Allow me to re-cite the often-cited 1600/80/12 rule. The
average consumer is exposed to 1600 advertising messages
each day, of which 80 are noticed and only twelve evoke
a reaction. More eloquent testimony to our ignorance about
advertising Ive never seen. (Youll notice there
is no statistic about how many of the twelve reactions lead
to a purchase, because theres no way to know.) It
tells us that, despite our best efforts, almost all of us
are doing it wrong almost all of the time. Im going
out on a limb and suggesting that this wouldnt be
true if we knew what we were doing.
The fact is, advertising is a guessing game and a crap shoot.
Sometimes advertising works, whatever that means. Sometimes
it doesnt. We dont know exactly why or how.
Most of the time we dont even know if. Your guess
may or may not be as good as mine about whether a particular
ad will work. Either way, its still a guess, and anyway,
chances are well never really know who guessed right.
(Still, someone has to decide. Whose judgement should hold
sway, and according to what criteria, will be the topic
of a subsequent column, just as soon as I figure it out.)
The good news is that all of this imprecision and ignorance
leaves us plenty of room for impassioned (albeit fruitless)
discussion, and affords each of us ample opportunity to
play the expert. In a village full of idiots, everyones
a genius.